By David Branker, Chief of Staff – Office of the President, OneHope
Healthy leadership is increasingly used beyond physical health to include mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being in the lives of leaders in faith-based communities. In her recent book, Holy Friendships: Nurturing Relationships that Sustain Pastors and Leaders, Dr. Victoria White writes, “Within many Christian institutions, I observe the ready assumption that ‘sustainability’ means financial viability. While financial viability is one aspect of an institution’s sustainability, it is not the most essential factor for nurturing a healthy and robust institutional life. An institution cannot thrive if its leaders are not healthy.” So, harried pastors and Christian leaders trying to keep their churches and institutions afloat should consider how they can invest in their sustainability. Have you invited your board or eldership into this space?
Throughout the years, we have witnessed countless beloved leaders of our generation fall due to some scandal or moral failure. I’m sure you already have in your mind the name of a great leader who started incredible ministries and touched the lives of millions but did not finish well, leaving countless people confused and heartbroken. These occurrences never get easier to process or understand. Still, as a student of governance, especially regarding healthy, accountable communities, I believe the role of governance in these failures has been under-examined. In essence, I believe that healthy governance and board leadership can be life-giving and offer an invaluable gift—to care for the well-being and flourishing of the leader in the same way they care for the organization’s well-being.
Perhaps a better form of progressive governance would have benefited and quite possibly avoided disaster if these two macro principles had been employed:
A healthy intentional evolution from founder’s governance to sustainable, collaborative governance. With the growth of these movements, a healthy transitional passing of not just the leadership baton but the governance structure from catalytic personality to an expanding community of leadership and accountability could have done a better job of saving these leaders from themselves. Creating an active, involved, and forthright “eldership” culture, particularly in the nondenominational space, is desperately needed to model a healthy transition.
A structural, relational accountability that overlaps formal legal governance is not a fail-safe but the healthiest means to nurture healthy accountability. Inviting and embracing disciplined, consistent, and influential authorities in our lives that are not siloed but enmeshed with legal governance brings a balance of accountable and relational authorities together in a healthy ecosystem.